Loren Robinson v. Jeffrey Woods
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
*712 The Supreme Court has interpreted the Sixth Amendment's jury guarantee to mean that "[a]ny fact that, by law, increases the penalty for a crime ... must be submitted to the jury and found beyond a reasonable doubt." Alleyne v. United States , 570 U.S. 99 , 103, 133 S.Ct. 2151 , 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013). In this appeal, petitioner Loren Robinson seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , arguing that the Michigan trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial by using judge-found facts to score sentencing variables that increased his mandatory…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Freddie Chase v. Matt MaCauleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Marcus Magnum Reign v. Lori GidleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Michael Kitchen v. Gretchen WhitmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Arnold v. VeshawDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Banks 734243 v. ParishDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2021
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.