Legal Opinion

Loren Robinson v. Jeffrey Woods

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2018No. 16-2067PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

*712 The Supreme Court has interpreted the Sixth Amendment's jury guarantee to mean that "[a]ny fact that, by law, increases the penalty for a crime ... must be submitted to the jury and found beyond a reasonable doubt." Alleyne v. United States , 570 U.S. 99 , 103, 133 S.Ct. 2151 , 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013). In this appeal, petitioner Loren Robinson seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , arguing that the Michigan trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial by using judge-found facts to score sentencing variables that increased his mandatory…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Freddie Chase v. Matt MaCauleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Marcus Magnum Reign v. Lori GidleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Michael Kitchen v. Gretchen WhitmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  4. Arnold v. VeshawDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  5. Banks 734243 v. ParishDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2021

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API