Tennessee MacHinery Co. v. Appalachian Energy Industries, Inc. (In Re Appalachian Energy Industries, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KEITH M. LUNDIN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The issue presented by these cross-motions for summary judgment is the order of priority of two conflicting security interests in a forklift. For the reasons stated below, the court finds that the bank’s security interest in after-acquired property is superi- or to the unperfected purchase money security interest preserved by the trustee pursuant to 11 U.S.C.A. § 551 (West 1979).
The following constitute findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 752 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.
The facts are not in dispute. On September…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Egyptian Supply Co. v. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Truman v. United States (In Re Tri-Sonic, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1979
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re Kors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Staats v. Barry (In Re Barry)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- Connelly v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.District Court, W.D. New York · 1986
- McCorhill Publishing, Inc. Ex Rel. Barr v. Greater New York Savings Bank (In Re McCorhill Publishing, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Carvell v. Bank One, Lafayette, N.A. (In Re Carvell)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.