Legal Opinion

Ex Parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 5, 1985No. 83-1434PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioner State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company seeks a writ of mandamus directing Judge Kenneth F. Ingram, as Circuit Judge of Clay County, to grant its motion to disqualify plaintiff's counsel in Durwood L. Holt v. State Farm MutualAuto. Ins. Co., a suit pending before Judge Ingram. Holt is suing for bad faith failure to pay a claim under his uninsured motorist coverage with State Farm. State Farm argues that because Holt's attorneys or their partners have represented State Farm on numerous occasions in actions relating to motor vehicle insurance, there is a substantial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,017 Carl R. Duncan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CahoonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. Ex Parte Taylor Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Cent. States Health & Life Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Ex Parte Regions BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Ex Parte RushCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  4. Threatt v. Sylacauga Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API