Legal Opinion

Hill v. Citizens National Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1934No. 31,139PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

These were actions to recover damages for the unlawful conversion of live stock. Judgment was for the plaintiff in each case. Defendant appeals.

W. W. Hill had borrowed about $20,000 from defendant bank; To secure this indebtedness he had given two notes and a chattel mortgage on several hundred head of sheep and sundry mules and cattle. When he shipped the sheep to market the proceeds were credited on his notes. This lacked about $10,000 of being enough to pay off.

The bank brought suit to collect the balance and to foreclose its chattel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cox v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Dimmock v. PloegerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schooley v. KerrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API