Legal Opinion

Folse v. Stennett-Yancey

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2000No. 97-CT-00291-SCTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITTMAN, Presiding Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. This appeal presents the question of the applicability of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically Rule 55 and its notice provisions, to garnishment actions. Paula Stennett-Yancey received a default judgment in a garnishment action. Glenn Folse, the judgment debtor, claimed that he was entitled to notice of those proceedings before default judgment could be granted. The Court of Appeals reversed the Lauderdale County Circuit Court’s refusal to set the default judgment aside. This Court granted Stennett-Yan-cey’s Petition for Writ of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First Miss. Nat. Bank v. KLH INDUSTRIESMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Fed. Sav. & Loan v. S. & W. CONST. CO.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Laurel v. TurnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Leader Nat. Ins. Co. v. LindseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yd Lumber Co., Inc. v. Humphreys CountyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2009
  2. Yd Lumber Co., Inc. v. Humphreys CountyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API