Legal Opinion

In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 15, 2019No. 2:11-cv-01016Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS IN RE: OHIO EXECUTION : Case No. 2:11-cv-1016 PROTOCOL LITIGATION : District Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. : Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz This document relates to all Plaintiffs. : ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY, DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND SETTING FILING DEADLINES FOR FUTURE MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION This consolidated § 1983 method of execution case is before the Court on Plaintiff Cleveland Jackson’s Amended Motion for a Stay of Execution, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fears v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. Edward Abney, Barbara Allen, James Day, Robert Green, Delbert Jackson, James Pugh, Roger L. Thacker, and Daniel Hunter Webster v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litig.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API