Wesley & Winter, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Judge:
The instant protest relates to two importations of crepe paper napkins which were classified by the collector of customs at the port of New York as manufactures of paper, not specially *25provided for. Duty was accordingly assessed thereon at the rate of 17J4 per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1413 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 84 Treas. Dec. 403, T. D. 52373, supplemented by Presidential proclamation, 85 Treas. Dec. 116, T. D. 52462. In its protest, plaintiff claimed that said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Douglas Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Hamilton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
3Cited by7 opinions
- Holmes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Aco Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- H. George Caspari, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- H. George Caspari, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.