Legal Opinion

Sellers v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 19, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The single justice was within his discretion in declining to grant the relief sought on the record before him. The petitioner did not allege, let alone demonstrate, that he had availed himself of all measures available to him in the trial court to obtain a ruling on his motions. See Matthews v. D’Arcy, 425 Mass. 1021, 1022 (1997) (identifying steps other than petition under G. L. c. 211, § 3, that litigant should take to address judicial inaction). See also Zatsky v. Zatsky, 36 Mass. App. Ct. 7,12 (1994) (“If a decision seems overdue, the first step a litigant can take is to make inquiry of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matthews v. D'ArcyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Sabree v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Empire Apartments, Inc. v. GrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. Commonwealth v. FelicianoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donald v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2024
  2. Smith v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API