Legal Opinion

Rosenfeld Construction Co. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1991No. F015413PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VARTABEDIAN, J.

—This is a petition for writ of mandate following respondent court’s denial of the motion of petitioner, Rosenfeld Construction Company, Inc., to disqualify the law firm of Wild, Carter, Tipton & Oliver (hereafter Wild) in its representation of real parties in interest, Paul Sivas and Jeanet Sivas. We grant the petition in part, directing respondent court to conduct a new hearing utilizing the proper standard, which we discuss herein.

Procedural and Factual Background

Petitioner brought a motion for disqualification of opposing counsel, the Wild firm, on the basis it had…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  2. Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. H. F. Ahmanson & Co. v. Salomon Brothers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. River West, Inc. v. NickelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Adams v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Jessen v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Responsible Citizens v. SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Henriksen v. Great American Savings & LoanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API