Bullion & Exchange Bank v. Otto
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada
At Law. Action by the Bullion & Exchange Bank against A. Otto and M. Healey to recover. possession of real estate and the rents and profits thereof. Judgment for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWLEY, District Judge,
(orally.) ‘ The principles involved in this case are in many respects substantially the same as in Ho. 572, *257and need not be again stated or discussed. In tliis case the testimony shows that James Marshall, acting for M. E. Spooner and the Bullion & Exchange Bank, under an oral agreement between said parties, took possession of the real estate known as the “Spooner Ranch,” to hold and keep possession thereof for the bank as the mortgagee of said property. The defendants in tills suit thereafter, on the 18th of November, 1892, obtained the possession of the real estate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Fogarty v. SawyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Marshall v. OttoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Edwards v. WrayU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1882
3Cited by1 opinion
- Douglass v. ThompsonNevada Supreme Court · 1912