Trenticosta v. Mamoulides
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GRISBAUM, Judge.
This writ of mandamus addresses an apparent conflict pursuant to the Louisiana Public Records Act and the statutorily mandated Work Product Rule. We affirm in part and set aside and vacate in part.
ISSUES
We are called upon to determine two specific questions:(1) Whether the appellate court has jurisdiction, and(2) Whether the Work Product Rule prevents any specific items from being disclosed in face of the Public Records Act.
BASIC RECORD FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Nicholas Trenticosta, plaintiff, is counsel for Tyronne Lindsey. Lindsey is currently a death row inmate, whose…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- State v. TrosclairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Hodges v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- State v. AtesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Landis v. MoreauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Innocence Project New Orleans v. New Orleans Police DepartmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Beasley v. CannizzaroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Boren v. TaylorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- James E. Boren v. Hon. Earl B. Taylor, District AttorneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.