F. T. Justice & Co. v. Rogers

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Quin

Reversing as to Jackson D. Rogers; affirming as to Jos. Rogers.-

Defendants (appellees) owned a lot of land in Lexington. Plaintiff (appellant), a corporation, was de'eirous -of purchasing the lot for yard purposes. As a result of certain negotiations between the defendant, Jackson D. Rogers, and F. T. Justice, president of the plaintiff company, they entered into the following contract:

“Lexington, Ky., March 28,1916.

“This agreement entered into by and between Jackson Rogers and Joseph Rogers, of Versailles, Kentucky, parties of the first part, and F. T.…