Legal Opinion

Rich v. Con-Stan Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 31, 1969No. 445PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNAGAN, Chief Justice.

This is a summary judgment case. Con-Stan Industries, Inc. sued Alberta Penny Rich in the 137th District Court of Lubbock County, Texas, to (1) establish that a California judgment against Alberta Penny Rich was entitled to full faith and credit, and (2) enjoin Alberta Penny Rich and her two distributors, Merle Hopkins and Ruby Stagner from the unauthorized use of two registered trademarks belonging to Con-Stan Industries, to-wit, “Sculptress” and “Banderín”.

Appellee’s petition alleged various acts that it contended constituted unfair competition and infringement of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. McElmoyle Ex Rel. Bailey v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBrideTexas Supreme Court · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bard v. Charles R. Myers Insurance Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Padron v. LopezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Four Seasons Gardening & Landscaping, Inc. v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  4. Elmer v. ElmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Cousins v. CousinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API