Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mitchell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 2010No. 2009-1502PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Donald Cameron Mitchell II of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0040985, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1988. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we indefinitely suspend respondent’s license to practice, based on findings that he intentionally attempted to deceive a juvenile court magistrate as to his identity and the status of his license to practice. We agree that respondent’s misrepresentations violated the Rules of Professional Conduct and that an indefinite suspension is appropriate.

{¶ 2} Relator,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. HoppelOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. LarkinOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Columbus Bar Assn. v. SqueoOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. LapeOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Austin (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API