Legal Opinion

Stapleton v. Pease

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Second District, Bemerhead County. ChuMAsero & Chadwiok, for the motion to dismiss the appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBlaKE, J.

The respondent moves to dismiss this appeal because the proper undertaking has not been filed. The statute *509requires that the undertaking on appeal shall be executed “ to the effect that the appellant will prosecute his appeal with effect, and will pay all damages and costs which may be awarded against him on the dismissal or trial of the appeal, not exceeding $300.” Sts. 8th Sess. 50, § 5. The undertaking in this case contains the following condition: “ The said plaintiffs will prosecute their appeal with effect, and pay all costs and damages which may be awarded against-plaintiffs and in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zoller v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Ex parte EastabrooksNew York Supreme Court · 1825

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Woodman v. CalkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Smith v. West Virginia Central Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API