Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Presnall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1912No. 1819Published

Error from District Court, Murray County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by P. A. Presnall and others against Hugh Rogers. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

This case is brought here for review from the district court of Murray county. The defendants in error brought this suit against Hugh Rogers, plaintiff in error, on a judgment rendered in the district court of Nueces county, Tex. The defendant answered pleading the statute of limitations and that he had not been served with summons in the action in which judgment was rendered against him in Nueces county, Tex., and that the judgment there rendered was not valid. He attached a copy of the judgment. The judgment attached shows that defendant was a nonresident of the state of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Cooper v. NewellSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Finch v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Wagner v. Sattley Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API