Legal Opinion

Raul v. Rynd

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided October 6, 2011No. C.A. No. 1:11-00560; C.A. No. 4:11-02706; MDL No. 2285Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel: * Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiff in an action pending in the Southern District of Texas moves to centralize in that district his action and an action pending in the District of Delaware (Raul).

The District of Delaware Raul plaintiff opposes centralization. Al defendants responded to the motion; they neither support nor oppose the motion, but believe discovery in these actions will be minimal and there is little danger of inconsistent pretrial rulings.

On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing session held, we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
  2. In Re Helicopter Crash Near Zachary, LouisianaUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2007
  3. United States v. CordovaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API