Legal Opinion

Crowe v. Colbeth

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for St. Croix Comity. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The respondent brought this action in the circuit court to enforce a vendor’s lien for the purchase money of a certain parcel of real estate which he had sold to August Handier during his life-time, and which the respondent claims was not paid by said August Handier in his ]ife-time„ nor by his personal representatives or heirs at law after his decease. The appellants are the administrator and the widow and heirs at law of the deceased. The answers are a general denial and payment.

*644On the trial in the court below the respondent offered in evidence the contract and deed set out in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bayley v. GreenleafSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. Wilkinson v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
  3. Horner v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Coles v. SoulsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. McKinster v. . BabcockNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Conant v. Estate of KimballWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Berger v. BergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Bartle v. BartleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Twohy Mercantile Co. v. Estate of McDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Yungwirth v. SchultzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API