Legal Opinion
Scott v. TOWN OF BLOOMFIELD
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 21, 1967PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
98 N.J. Super. 321 (1967)
237 A.2d 297
DONALD L. SCOTT AND THEODORE DUNN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
TOWN OF BLOOMFIELD, RALPH G. CONTE AND H. JOSEPH NORTH, DEFENDANTS, AND BOYS' CLUB OF BLOOMFIELD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 11, 1967.
Decided December 21, 1967.
Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEONARD.
Mr. Paul Alongi for appellant (Messrs. Marinello, Henkel, Soriano & Klein, attorneys).
Mr. David C. Thompson for respondents (Messrs. Joyce & Brown, attorneys).
Mr. Elias Abelson, Deputy Attorney General, for State of New Jersey, intervenor,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Scott v. Town of BloomfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
3Cited by8 opinions
- McComas v. Bd. of Educ. of Fayette CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- Davidson Bros. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Scott v. Town of BloomfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- WOODBURY DAILY TIMES CO. v. Gloucester Cty. Sew. Auth.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- La Fronz v. WEEHAWKEN BOARD OF EDUCATIONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.