Legal Opinion

Halsey v. Beer

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Submission on agreed statement of facts.

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

This is a submission without action, to determine the succession to real property in the county of Suffolk, described in the statement printed in the case. David E. Pierson died seised and possessed of the property in question on the 16th day of February, 1888, intestate as to this real estate. He was 21 years of age at the time of his death, and this property was devised to him by the last will and testament of his father, David Pier-son, who died on the 14th day of October, 1871, who was the onlychild of bis father, who had owned this property many years before his death, and who was the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Leonard v. GrantUnited States Circuit Court · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Nicola v. WilliamsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1909
  2. Laconte v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Daly v. BeerNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Wainwright v. LowNew York Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API