Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Anderson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 27, 1985No. 84—1136, 84—1137 consPublished

1Concurrence

JUSTICE LINN,

specially concurring:

It is apparent from the record that the experienced and conscientious trial judge sought to impose a sentence commensurate with the nature and circumstances of the offense, and the history and character of the defendants. As noted in People v. Merritt (1977), 53 Ill. App. 3d 929, 931, 369 N.E.2d 113:

“We are mindful of the constant and continuing struggle of even the most able and resourceful judge in arriving at a sentence that is just. It is fashionable to blame increased societal violence on sentences believed to be inappropriate whether they be too mild or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. SteffensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. People v. FranklinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. People v. SprinkleIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. RenoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. People v. PainoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API