Legal Opinion · Dissent

Joliet Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Bloomington Loan Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 10, 1970No. 68-77Published

1DissentJustice Stouder

I disagree with the result reached by the majority of the Court. I cannot subscribe to the view that the operation of par. 63, ch. 95, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1963, may depend on whether the senior mortgagee decides to be courteous.

It requires no citation of authority to support the general proposition that the law does not favor mortgage foreclosures. Equitable principles have generally been applied to mortgage foreclosures in an effort to protect the rights of all parties concerned.

Concededly, par. 63, ch. 95, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1963, is designed to avoid the necessity of mortgage foreclosure. Such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hitchcock v. FortierIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Branch v. BarnesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API