Legal Opinion

Moore v. New York Elevated Railroad

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 3, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from trial term. Action by Eliza Jane Moore against the TSTew York Elevated Railroad Company and another. A motion made at trial term to set aside the verdict on the ground of the misconduct of the jury was denied, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

This was a common-law action, brought to recover damages for the maintenance and operation of the elevated railroad in front of the plaintiff’s premises, 371 Greenwich street. The action had been on trial for more than two days, when, a witness for defendant not being present as subpoenaed, the'defendants’ counsel requested the court to take its usual recess, it then being near that hour, and suggested that meanwhile the jurors might visit the premises. To this plaintiff’s counsel assented; and the presiding judge gave the jury such permission, provided they all went together. Some of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Riggs v. . PursellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Dana v. TuckerNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  3. Hackley v. HastieNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  4. Argall v. JacobsNew York Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Valiente v. BryanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Haight v. City of ElmiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Buffalo Structural Steel Co. v. DickinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Fleischmann v. SamuelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Dennis v. TishmanNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Elliott v. LuengeneCity of New York Municipal Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API