Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Quade

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1885No. 11,757PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Jasper Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The first paragraph of the appellee’s com*365plaint seeks to recover the value of a mare and colt killed by the locomotive of the appellant, at a place where the track was not fenced, on the 7th day of May, 1882, and the second paragraph seeks to recover the value of a cow killed at the ■same place, on the 5th day of June, 1882. The value of the property described in the first paragraph of the complaint is alleged to be $225, and the value of that described in the second paragraph is alleged to be $40.

Filed April 2, 1885.

The appellant demurred to the second paragraph upon the ground that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. BrevoortIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Indianapolis & Cincinnati R. R. v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Toledo, Burlington & Logansport Railway Co. v. TiltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. KerchevalIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago R. W. Co. v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. RamseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Director General of Railroads v. WilfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  3. Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. SpencerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API