Legal Opinion

Musselman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1925No. 8827PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is murder; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of fifteen years.

The companion case of Jim Ballew v. State, is reported in 260 S. W. Rep. 1046. The evidence in the present trial is not different from that which led to the conviction of Ballew save that in that trial the - appellant in the present case testified as a witness for the State entailing the necessity for corroborative evidence. In the present case, her testimony upon the trial of Ballew, as well as upon the habeas corpus trial in which he sought bail, was reproduced.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boaz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Pickens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Casey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Pratt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Regittano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Tuck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Tuck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API