Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brito Carrasco v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 19, 2005No. PD-0173-04Published

1Concurrence

COCHRAN, J.,

filed a concurring opinion in which HOLCOMB, J., joined.

I join the majority opinion. I write separately only to emphasize that there is an important distinction between a stipulation of evidence and an admission of a party opponent, which may be contained within a stipulation.

A valid written stipulation of evidence which meets the legal requirements of formality is binding on the parties in that trial.1 It is conclusive evidence of the facts to be proved and may not be countered with other evidence — at least not over objection.2 A formal stipulation of evidence which has been…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hollen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. M.J.R.'s Fare of Dallas, Inc. v. Permit & License Appeal Board of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  3. Chaney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Perry v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Valdes v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API