Legal Opinion
Application of B.E.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 6, 1891PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is a proceeding, under the provisions of the General Railroad Act, to acquire real estate interests in Grand avenue in the city of Brooklyn from Charles U. Wing for the purpose of the Brooklyn Elevated railroad. Issue was taken upon the allegations of the petition, and the matter was brought to a hearing before a justice of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of N.Y. Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Farnsworth, Trustees v. Minnesota and Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Oakland Railroad v. Oakland, Brooklyn, & Fruit Vale RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Briggs v. Cape Cod Ship Canal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Bank of Niagara v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1832
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- A.J. Temple Marble & Tile, Inc. v. Union Carbide Marble Care, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Santa Rosa City R. Co. v. Central St. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Village of Stillwater v. Hudson Valley Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Fitzgerald v. WashingtonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975
- Richardson v. Treasure Hill Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1901
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.