Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Stanfield v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1954No. 33198PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hershey

Pennsylvania Railroad Company, defendant-appellee, hereinafter called objector, having previously paid its taxes in full under protest, filed an objection to a portion of the levy made for educational purposes by Community Unit School District No. 2 of Edgar County, which, with the People ex rcl. A. Lincoln Stanfield, County Collector, are plaintiff-appellants. The county court of Edgar County sustained the objection. A direct appeal was taken to this court, a matter relating to revenue being involved.

The basis for the objection to the levy made for educational purposes and the rate extended…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Larson v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  2. People Ex Rel. Toman v. Estate of OtisIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  3. People Ex Rel. Lindheimer v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People Ex Rel. Schlaeger v. SiebelIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People Ex Rel. Manifold v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. County Collector v. ATI Carriage House, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re Application of County CollectorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. People Ex Rel. Weber v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. People ex rel. Garwood v. New York Central Railroad Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In Re Application of Du Page County CollectorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API