Legal Opinion

R.D. v. A.W. & M.W.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 2013No. 26A01-1208-JP-372Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES: JASON SPINDLER MICHAEL R. COCHREN Spindler Law Princeton, Indiana Princeton, Indiana Apr 04 2013, 9:30 am IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA R.D, ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. 26A01-1208-JP-372 ) A.W. & M.W., ) ) Appellees. ) APPEAL FROM THE GIBSON CIRCUIT COURT The Honorable Jeffrey Meade, Judge Cause No.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Marriage of HussIndiana Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API