Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 8, 2017No. Nos. 16-3300, -3303, -3304PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

Beginning in 1996, the plaintiff-appellants, subsidiaries of the Canadian National Railway Company (to simplify we’ll refer to the subsidiaries as “the railway”), began including stock options in the compensation plans of a number of employees. In this suit against the government, the railway argues that income from the exercise of stock options that a railroad gives its employees is not a form of “money remuneration” to them and is therefore not taxable to the railway as compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, 26 U.S.C. § 3281(e)(1), which defines…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Standard Office Building Corporation and Santa Fe Land Improvement Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. BNSF Railway Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. Illinois Central Railroad Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API