Legal Opinion

Goforth v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 16, 1994No. 11-93-033-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCLOUD, Chief Justice.

The trial court found appellant guilty of aggravated manufacture of amphetamine and assessed punishment at confinement for 99 years and a $75,000 fine. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.-113(e) & (d)(2) (Vernon 1992). We affirm.

In his sole point of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we must determine whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the finding of guilt, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility RatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Engelking v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. McGlothlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alfred Delbert McCloy v. Milton Messner, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  2. Terry Glenn Honeycutt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
  3. Terry Glenn Honeycutt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
  4. Terry Glenn Honeycutt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API