Cade v. One 1987 Dodge Lancer Shelby 4-Door
Idaho Court of Appeals
1DissentSilak, Acting Judge
Because I believe application of the defense of entrapment in civil forfeiture proceedings is inherent in the operation and construction of Idaho’s forfeiture statute, I respectfully dissent.
In order to have Allen’s vehicle forfeited under I.C. § 37-2744, the state must prove by a preponderance that the controlled substances transported in the vehicle were “manufactured, distributed, dispensed, acquired, possessed or held in violation of this act.”6 Thus, by the plain language of I.C. § 37-2744, forfeiture must be predicated on a violation of the Controlled Substances Act, I.C. §§ 37-2701 to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. MataIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. KollerIdaho Supreme Court · 1992