Legal Opinion
Dutch v. Gordon
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 24, 1985No. 85-970PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
481 So.2d 1235 (1985)
Jack DUTCH, Appellant,
v.
Joseph GORDON, Max Hochman, Edna Wisser, Sam Lindenaur and Tall Trees Condominium, Inc., Appellees.
No. 85-970.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
December 24, 1985.
Rehearing Denied February 18, 1986.
Hyman & Kaplan and Joseph H. Ganguzza, Miami, for appellant.
Joseph C. Segor, Miami, Leff, Pesetsky & Zack, North Miami Beach, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.
2Per curiam
It has been established law in this state that before a stockholder or shareholder derivative action[1] can be maintained it is necessary for the complainant…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Bartlett v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Orlando Orange Groves Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Conlee Construction Co. v. Cay Construction Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Warren Telephone Co. v. StatonOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
4Cited by3 opinions
- Rogers & Ford Const. v. Carlandia Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1993
- In Re Mercedes Homes, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2009
- JON J. RAPPAPORT v. ARTHUR F. SCHERR, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021