Legal Opinion

Dodson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 10, 1929No. 19427Published

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

1. Special ground 2 of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the exclusion of certain oral evidence, is too incomplete to raise any question for the consideration of this court, since it fails to show that a pertinent question was propounded to the witness and that the answer thereto was excluded. See Griffin v. Henderson, 117 Ga. 382 (2) (43 S. E. 712); Ward v. Johnson, 23 Ga. App. 479 (3) (98 S. E. 405).

2. The instructions of the court to the jury were full and fair, and there is no merit in special ground 1, which complains of the court’s refusal to give a charge requested; nor in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Griffin v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Ward v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API