Legal Opinion · Dissent

Crouch v. Forbes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1911No. 8953Published

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Mitchell, J., entered March 24, 1910, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action for a broker’s commission.

1DissentFullerton, J.

(dissenting) — The appellants are real estate brokers. . The respondent owned a farm situated in Mason county, and sometime prior to September 3, 1909, requested the appellants to visit her at the farm for consultation, with the view of entering into a contract for a sale of the farm on commission. On the date named, the appellants visited her as requested, when a proposed contract in the following form was drawn up and submitted to her:

“Olympia, September 3, 1909.
“This is to certify that I, Cornelia A. Forbes of Mason county, Wash., the owner of the following described property, to wit:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keith v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Peirce v. WheelerWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Foote v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Briggs v. BoundsWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Ross v. KaufmanWashington Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API