Legal Opinion

Bourgeois v. Ford

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1994No. 93-CA-1040PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

jjWICKER, Judge.

This appeal arises from an action in redhi-bition filed on behalf of Joan Bourgeois, wife of and Joseph F. Fricano, plaintiffs/appellees, against Cathy Ford, wife of and Ronnie Dale *269Bennick, defendants/appellants. Bourgeois and Frieano sought a recession of the sale of a house with a cracked slab purchased from Ford and Bennick or alternatively a reduction in the purchase price. The trial judge awarded damages in quanti minoris to Bourgeois and Frieano in the amount of $9,600.00 plus legal interest and costs. Ford and Ben-nick now appeal. We reverse.

On May 30, 1986 Bourgeois…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Fitzmorris v. KellySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  3. Payne v. QuinnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Sievert v. HendersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. St. Claire v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fruge v. HancockLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. LeBlanc v. FaulLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API