Legal Opinion

W. S. Rockwell Co. v. Naumburg

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 9, 1915No. 49PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action at law by the W. S. Rockwell Company against Bernard Naumburg. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

WARD; Circuit Judge.

This is an action to recover damages of the defendant Naumburg, treasurer of the Trans fiormetal Tool Steel Company, on the ground that he had fraudulently represented to the plaintiff, either knowing the contrary, or recklessly, not knowing anything about it, that a certain process for manufacturing steel was owned by the Metal Company, was secret, and was not patented, in reliance upon which representation the plaintiff entered into a contract with the Metal Company with reference to such process and incurred expenses in exploiting it, whereas in point of fact the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kountze v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Hadcock v. . OsmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Pittsburgh Life & Trust Co. v. Northern Central Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ouachita Industries v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API