Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Moeckly

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1987No. 14802PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

Action

This is an original proceeding concerning the discipline of attorney Kent August Moeckly (Moeckly) under SDCL 16-19-36. The Disciplinary Board of the South Dakota Bar Association (Board) recommends disbarment. We find that Moeckly is not, at this time, fit to engage in the practice of law and we therefore enter an order of disbarment.

Facts

Moeckly was admitted to the bar on September 6, 1974. He practiced law in Brit-ton, South Dakota and also worked on a part-time basis as a law trained magistrate.

On October 6, 1984, a jury of the United States District Court (D.Minn.3d)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Kent August Moeckly, Joseph Diego Ramirez, and William J. Coulombe, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. In Re the Discipline of ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re the Discipline of LoobySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Matter of Discipline of ReutterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of JeffriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Matter of Discipline of JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Matter of Discipline of CoacherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Matter of Discipline of JanuszSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Matter of Discipline of JeffriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API