Wilder v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Because of the penalty assessed we have again examined the statement of facts. The punishment can be attributed to the brutal conduct of appellant.

In his motion for new trial appellant averred that one of the jurors was prejudiced against appellant, and had not apprised appellant and his counsel of his feeling upon his voir dire examination. The motion was supported by affidavit. The State replied to said motion specifically denying- the charges that had been made against the juror, and supported said denial by affidavits. The order of the…