Legal Opinion

Supreme Lodge, Ancient Order United Workmen v. Hutchinson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1893No. 866PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

This was an action by appellee upon a beneficiary certificate issued to Charles A. Hutchinson, who was a member of A. O. U. W.

The facts from which the controversy arises are these:

The A. O. H. W. is a “fraternal, charitable, beneficial, and benevolent order, organized for the promotion of the social and fraternal welfare of its members, and the protection of those dependent upon them.” Its constitution has the following provisions as to membership and applications :

“37. Membership — Ao person shall be admitted to membership in the order except he be a white male of the full age of twenty-one…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Supreme Council American Legion of Honor v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. HazelettIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Bauer v. Samson LodgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Mutual Life Insurance v. WilerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Ballou v. GileWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lawson v. United States. Retz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Supreme Tent of the Knights of the Maccabees of the World v. McAllisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Union Central Life Insurance v. PaulyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Afro-American Life Ins. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Masons' Union Life Insurance v. BrockmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API