Legal Opinion

Sayegh v. Fiore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 25, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*982To establish entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in a case alleging discrimination, the “defendants must demonstrate either plaintiffs failure to establish every element of intentional discrimination, or, having offered legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for their challenged actions, the absence of a material issue of fact as to whether their explanations were pretextual” (Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind, 3 NY3d 295, 305 [2004]; see Michno v New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens, 71 AD3d 746 [2010]; Apiado v North Shore Univ. Hosp. [At Syosset], 66 AD3d 929 [2009]; Balsamo v Savin…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Forrest v. Jewish Guild for the BlindNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Ferrante v. American Lung Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Thompson v. Lamprecht TransportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Morse v. Cowtan & Tout, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Apiado v. North Shore University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ehmann v. Good Samaritan Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. King v. North Shore Long Is. Jewish Hosp. at PlainviewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API