Legal Opinion

Eusco, Inc. v. Huddleston

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1992PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

At issue in this sales tax direct appeal is whether the taxpayer’s sales of truck bodies to out-of-state utility companies constitute either “selling tangible personal property at retail in this state,” or “installing of tangible personal property ... where a charge is made for such installation,” so as to make the sales taxable under the Retailers’ Sales Tax Act; or whether the sales fall within the exemption for “articles of tangible personal property imported into this state or produced or manufactured in this state for export.” The Chancellor found that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Covington Pike Toyota, Inc. v. CardwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Jack Daniel Distillery, Lem Motlow, Prop. v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. LeTourneau Sales & Service, Inc. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Western Pipe Line Constructors, Inc. v. DickinsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  5. NASCO, Inc. v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Arguello v. Conoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. CAO Holdings, Inc. v. TrostTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Freedom Broadcasting of TN, Inc. v. Tennessee Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  4. Hachar v. Hachar, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  5. Wylie Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API