Legal Opinion

Deering Harvester Co. v. Zink

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1907No. Appeal, No. 10Published

Appeal, No. 10, March T., 1907, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Clinton Co., Jan. T., 1906, No. 90, reversing judgment of a justice of the peace in case of Deering Harvester Co. v. Valentine Zink. Certiorari to justice of the peace. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the judgment of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam,

The plaintiff brought an action against the defendant before a justice of the peace upon a promissory note and obtained judgment. The defendant removed the proceedings to the common pleas by certiorari, and that court upon consideration of the exceptions made this order: “ The judgment of the justice reversed and judgment entered in favor of defendant for costs.” The Act of May 11, 1901, P. L. 164, provides, that where proceedings shall be removed by certiorari from ■before a justice of the peace by the defendant, in case “ said proceedings are reversed and judgment given by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Palmer & Co. v. LacockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  2. Silvergood v. StorrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API