Bunting v. Tedford
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Donis B. Hamilton, Special Justice.
This case involves an appeal from a decision of the Pulaski Circuit Court refusing to grant a writ of mandamus against appellees. The writ, if granted, would have required appellees to meet as a board pursuant to Ark. Stats. Ann. Section 84-444 (1960 Repl.) to fix a value on property reported by appellants as being non-assessed personal property. Appellants claimed a 10% statutory bounty for discovering the property.
The material facts are not in dispute. Appellants filed a sworn statement with the county clerk in which they alleged that sixteen banks and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Plummer v. ColerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- MacAllen Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Colorado National Bank of Denver v. BedfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wells v. PurcellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Chandler v. Perry-Casa Public Schools District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Buttolph Trust v. JarnaganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Redd v. SossamonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Rottinghaus v. HolderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.