Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1997No. S-6613Published

1Opinion of the Court

948 P.2d 473 (1997)

Douglas Leon SMITH, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Alaska, Respondent.

No. S-6613.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

November 21, 1997.

Walter Share, Seattle, David Loutrel, Anchorage, for Petitioner.

Nancy R. Simel, Assistant Attorney General, Anchorage, Bruce M. Botelho, Attorney General, Juneau, for Respondent.

Before RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS, COMPTON, EASTAUGH and FABE, JJ.

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this case we are called upon to decide whether evidence obtained illegally may be admissible under the "inevitable discovery" or "independent source" exceptions to the exclusionary rule.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Eastaugh; Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Eastaugh.

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. People v. FitzpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API