Legal Opinion

Mohr v. Cochran

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 19, 1899PublishedCited by 9 opinions

'Error from Harris. Tried below before Hon. John G. Tod.

1Opinion of the Court

PLEASANTS, Associate Justice.

The motion of defendants to strike out the transcript in this cause, because the same purports to be the record of two separate and distinct suits, with different parties, suing for the recovery of different lands, and in which suits separate judgments were rendered, should, in our opinion, be sustained. It appears from the record that the parties to the two suits agreed that they might be tried together in the lower court; but this is not an agreement, conceding that it was competent for the parties to make such an agreement, which, to say the least, is…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Home Telephone &. Electric Co. v. BrantonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Moore v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. CoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Harper v. StumpffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Bay v. MecomTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Bay v. MecomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API