Legal Opinion

City of Birhingham v. Comer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 7, 1940No. 6 Div. 558PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Action for personal injuries to a pedestrian laid to the negligence of the city’s servants in the maintenance of the sidewalk.

The cause was tried on Count 2 of the complaint to which demurrers were interposed and overruled. This ruling is presented for review.

The pertinent averments of the count are:

While walking on a public sidewalk at a designated point, “Plaintiff was caused to fall into a chasm, gorge or hole, at the end of the wide part of said sidewalk, and that said chasm, gorge or hole at the end of the wide part of said sidewalk was abutting upon, and in close…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alabama Baptist Hospital Board v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Bennett v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. City of Montgomery v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. City of Montgomery v. MoonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Clikos v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Norwood Clinic, Inc. v. SpannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Weston v. National Manufacturers & Stores Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Opelika Montgomery Fair Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API