M.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS M. GALLEN, Associate Senior Judge.
M.M., the Father, seeks review of the trial court’s order which placed A.M. in a permanent guardianship and terminated protective supervision over the child. The Father argues that the trial court erred in failing to make written findings explaining why reunification was not possible. The Department and the Guardian ad Litem concede error. We find these concessions to be proper because written findings are required by section 39.6221(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2008).
Ordinarily, we would simply reverse and remand for the court to make the necessary…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- CD v. Department of Children and FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
3Cited by2 opinions
- C.A. v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- In Re AMDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009