Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 26, 1956No. 16276PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The facts of this case are well recited and the controlling principles of law are well stated in the opinion of Judge Rice, R. F. Ball Construction Company v. Jacobs, D.C., 140 F.Supp. 60. For the reasons there set forth the judgment appealed from is

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. RF Ball Construction Company v. JacobsDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1956

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. L. C. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  2. Mason City and Clear Lake R. Co. v. Imperial Seed Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1957
  3. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Antonelli Construction Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1959
  4. Gauvey v. Basin Rig & Trucking, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1960
  5. United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Company, Inc., and United Pacific Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API