Legal Opinion
Clackamas County Oregon, May 21 v. Clackamas River Water
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 24, 2016No. CV13060731; A157776PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.
Contestor Mitchell alleges that contestees Sowa, Humbertson, and Kalani knew of illegal votes cast in their election to the board of commissioners of Clackamas River Water (CRW), a domestic water supply district. As authorized by ORS 258.026 and ORS 258.036, contestor filed a petition of contest of election, seeking to set aside their election. With leave of the trial court, CRW intervened to defend the validity of the election; none of the contestees actively participated in the proceeding. The trial court rejected con-testor’s challenge, finding that contestor did not meet his burden of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Equilon Enterprises, LLC v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Montara Owners Assn. v. La Noue Development, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- White v. VogtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
3Cited by4 opinions
- Davoodian v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Tokarski v. WildfangCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Davoodian v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Laack v. BotelloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025